I had a debate with some friends at work the other day, about whether the higher-order function map just adds needless complexity to a language. They considered it a kind of “advanced” function, which surprised me. They said that by not having a variable that holds the current item, it was too concise and cryptic. So I did an experiment.
Daddy: I have a number i, it starts at 1, increases each time and stops and three, and for each i, take Oreo i and eat it.
5 year old: Oreo i? Oreos?
He walked away puzzled. A few days later, I tried again:
Daddy: For each Oreo o, eat o.
5 year old: ??
Again he just walked away without understanding what I’d said.
Daddy: Eat the Oreos.
5 year old: Sure! Yay!
In natural language, at least, we often don’t introduce a term to stand for the thing we’re talking about. Introducing it can just make your expression round about and clunky, giving you lots of noun and verb phrases to decode. Strunk’s Elements of Style says “Vigorous writing is concise.” The same can apply in programming.